High Conservation Value or High Confusion Value? Sustainable Agriculture and Biodiversity Conservation in the Tropics

Author(s): Edwards, D.P. Fisher, B. Wilcove, D.S.
Publication Year: 2012
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source: Conservation Letters (5, 20-27)
Code:
Access to the Study:
Permanent Resource Identifier: Open link
FSC Resource Identifier: Open link
Collections: FSC Research Portal
Abstract

Green labeling of products that have been produced sustainably is an emerg- ing tool of the environmental movement. A prominent example is the Forest Stewardship Council, which certifies timber that is harvested to manage and maintain forests defined as having High Conservation Value (HCV). The cri- teria for HCV are now being applied to four rapidly expanding crops in the tropics: oil palm, soy, sugarcane, and cacao. However, these criteria do not pro- vide adequate protection for biodiversity when applied to agriculture. The only criterion that provides blanket protection to forests is one that protects large expanses of habitat (?20,000–500,000 ha, depending on the country). Absent of other HCVs, the collective clearing of forest patches below these thresh- olds could result in extensive deforestation that would be sanctioned with a green label. Yet such forest patches retain much biodiversity and provide con- nectivity within the agricultural matrix. An examination of forest fragments in biodiverse countries across the tropics shows that future agricultural de- mand can be met by clearing only forest patches below a 1,000 ha threshold. We recommend the development of a new HCV criterion that recognizes the conservation value of habitat patches within the agricultural matrix and that protects patches above 1,000 ha.

Summary
Description
Citation
Sustainability dimension(s): Environmental
Topics: Compositional diversity
Subtopics: (not yet curated)
Subject Keywords: Forests Certification
Regions: (not yet curated)
Countries: Nigeria, Brazil, Indonesia
+ 1
Forest Zones: Tropical
Forest Type: Plantation
Tenure Ownership: (not yet curated)
Tenure Management: (not yet curated)
Evidence Category: FSC effect-related studies
Evidence Type: Comparative study with no matched control
Evidence Subtype: Data collected post-intervention
Data Type: Focus groups