Are community-based forest enterprises in the tropics financially viable? Case studies from the Brazilian Amazon

Author(s): Humphries, S.S. Holmes, T.P. Kainer, K.A. Koury, C.G.G. Cruz, E.
+ 1
Publication Year: 2012
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source: Ecological Economics (77, 62-73)
Code:
Access to the Study:
Permanent Resource Identifier: Open link
FSC Resource Identifier: Open link
Collections: FSC Research Portal
Abstract

Community-based forest management is an integral component of sustainable forest management and con- servation in the Brazilian Amazon, where it has been heavily subsidized for the last ten years. Yet knowledge of the financial viability and impact of community-based forest enterprises (CFEs) is lacking. This study eval- uates the profitability of three CFEs in the Brazilian Amazon: Ambé, an industrial-scale, upland forest opera- tion producing logs in a national forest, in Pará state; ACAF, a small-scale operation in flooded forests producing boards with a portable sawmill in Amazonas state; and Mamirauá, one of 30 CFEs in a reserve in Amazonas state producing logs and boards in flooded forests. Costs for each CFE were compiled by forest management activity and cost type. Annual total costs were calculated as the sum of fixed and variable costs and then subtracted from total revenue to obtain annual profit. The annual rate of return on investment was calculated by dividing profits by total costs. The Ambé and Mamirauá cases were profitable, demonstrat- ing rates of return of approximately 12% and 2%, respectively; the ACAF case was not profitable. This study illustrates the benefits of cost-sharing among CFEs, and the potential return for investments in small and large-scale community forestry.

Summary
Description
Citation
Sustainability dimension(s): Economic Social
Topics: Market Profitability Local communities and Indigenous peoples
Subtopics: Price premium Income
Subject Keywords: Forests Certification
Regions: South America
Countries: Brazil
Forest Zones: Tropical
Forest Type: Natural Forest
Tenure Ownership: Community
Tenure Management: Community
Evidence Category: FSC effect-related studies
Evidence Type: Monitoring report
Evidence Subtype: Performance
Data Type: Case studies, Focus groups, Interviews/surveys